EBSD (3)

edge location with respect to image:

left

Voltage:

30 kV

Beam Intensity or current:

20

Voltage:

30 kV

Beam Intensity or current:

20

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• Mg-3Al_2p5_AC_1_3-2-34-5_300edge-clean-gf2.txt
• Mg-3Al_2p5_AC_2_3-2-34-5_through1250-clean-gf2.txt
• Mg-3Al_2p5_AC_2_3-2-34-5_through1250-cleangrain.bmp
• Mg-3Al_2p5_AC_3_3-2-34-5_center500-clean-gf2.txt

EPMA Data Collection (7)

Date:

42402

Date:

42655

Date:

42359

Date:

42293

Region of interest:

near edge

Region of interest:

edge

Region of interest:

center

Elements Measured:

Mg, Al, Zn, Mn

Elements Measured:

Al, Mg

number of measurements made:

400

data start row:

501

data start row:

1

data start row:

401

data end row:

900

data end row:

400

data end row:

800

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• berman_STAM50_STAM60_Mg_3Al_run20161012.docx
• berman_STAM50_STAM60_Mg_3Al_run20161012.xlsx
• epma_berman_run20151221_as_cast_binaries.docx
• epma_berman_run20151221_as_cast_binaries.xls
• epma_berman_run20160201_Mg_9Al_and_Mg_3Al.docx
• epma_berman_run20160201_Mg_9Al_and_Mg_3Al.xlsx

EPMA WIRS Analysis (3)

Date:

10/26/2016

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

Region of Interest:

Edge

Region of Interest:

Center

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• EPMA_Analysis.nb
• EPMA_Scans.xlsx
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_center_0C_0min.tif
  
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_center_0C_0min.xls
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_edge_0C_0min.tif
  
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_edge_0C_0min.xls
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_near edge_0C_0min.tif
  
• Scheil_Mg-3%Al_2p5_near edge_0C_0min.xls

Forward Model Simulation (11)

Region of Interest:

center

Region of Interest:

edge

Region of Interest:

near edge

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.55 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.35 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.3 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.25 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.5 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.45 k_v

Mean simulated Al contentl:

3.16 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

3.1 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

2.81 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

3.19 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

2.35 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

1.51 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

1.33 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

2.34 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

1.13 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

2.53 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

2.71 wt%

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.35

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.12

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.08

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.77

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.34

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.38

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

1.73

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.07

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.01

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.03

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• Forward_Model_final.nb
• Sim_Mg-3%Al_0_2p5_center_400_0.25.tif
  
• Sim_Mg-3%Al_0_2p5_center_400_0.25.xls

Phase Fraction Analysis (3)

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

Region of Interest:

Edge

Region of Interest:

Center

Number of images analyzed:

10

Number of images analyzed:

9

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• PhaseSeparationAlgorithm_Final.m

Received As-Cast Plates (1)

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

SEM Imaging (3)

Date:

3/14/2016

Region of Interest:

Center

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

Region of Interest:

Edge

View Field Width:

50 µm

View Field Width:

200 µm

Imaging Mode:

SE

Voltage:

10 keV

Beam Intensity:

10

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-3Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

1.357 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.38 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

0.868 %

Mean experimental Al content:

1.28 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

3.62 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

2.57 wt%

Plate Thickness:

2.5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.299 %

Standard deviation:

0.163 %

Standard deviation:

0.445 %

Composition Al Content:

3.12 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.09 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

96.79 wt %

Files

• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2270-tif.hdr
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2270.tif
  
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2271-tif.hdr
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2271.tif
  
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2272-tif.hdr
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2272.tif
  
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2273-tif.hdr
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2273.tif
  
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2274-tif.hdr
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2274.tif
  
• Mg_3Al_2p5_center_2275-tif.hdr
See 47 more files......