Sample: Mg-9Al_2p5 Ungroup Processes
Last Updated: 2 days ago Owner: Tracy Berman ID: 67416
EPMA Data Collection (6)
Date:
42640
Date:
42402
Date:
42368
Region of interest:
near edge
Region of interest:
edge
Region of interest:
center
Elements Measured:
Mg, Al, Zn, Mn
Elements Measured:
Al, Mg
number of measurements made:
400
number of measurements made:
131
number of measurements made:
441
data start row:
1642
data start row:
1301
data start row:
801
data start row:
401
data start row:
1701
data start row:
1
data end row:
2082
data end row:
1200
data end row:
800
data end row:
1831
data end row:
1700
data end row:
400
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
Files
EPMA WIRS Analysis (3)
Region of Interest:
Center
Region of Interest:
Edge
Region of Interest:
Near Edge
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
Files
Forward Model Simulation (11)
Region of Interest:
edge
Region of Interest:
near edge
Region of Interest:
center
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.45 k_v
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.4 k_v
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.5 k_v
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.25 k_v
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.3 k_v
Simulated partition coefficient:
0.35 k_v
Mean simulated Al contentl:
6.81 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
7.52 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
3.96 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
3.47 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
7.74 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
8.59 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
7.65 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
8.89 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
6.96 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
6.3 wt%
Mean simulated Al contentl:
6.84 wt%
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.83
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
1.39
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.73
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.79
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
2.1
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.98
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
1.81
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.6
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.09
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
0.13
Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:
4.01
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
Files
Phase Fraction Analysis (3)
Region of Interest:
Near Edge
Region of Interest:
Edge
Region of Interest:
Center
Number of images analyzed:
13
Number of images analyzed:
11
Number of images analyzed:
12
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
Files
Received As-Cast Plates (1)
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
SEM Imaging (3)
Date:
1/25/2016
Region of Interest:
Center
Region of Interest:
Edge
Region of Interest:
Near Edge
View Field Width:
200 µm
View Field Width:
50 µm
Imaging Mode:
SE
Voltage:
10 keV
Beam Intensity:
10
Measurements
Alloy Name:
Mg-9Al
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
6.426 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
11.248 %
beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:
8.074 %
Mean experimental Al content:
3.76 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
8.65 wt%
Mean experimental Al content:
7.44 wt%
Plate Thickness:
2.5 mm
Standard deviation:
0.697 %
Standard deviation:
1.065 %
Standard deviation:
0.738 %
Composition Al Content:
8.99 wt %
Composition Mn Content:
0.11 wt %
Composition Mg Content:
90.9 wt %
Files