View Sample

Sample: Mg-9Al_5p0 Ungroup Processes

EPMA Data Collection (4)

Settings

Date:

42402

Date:

42724

Date:

42368

Region of interest:

near edge

Region of interest:

edge

Region of interest:

center

Elements Measured:

Mg, Al, Zn, Mn

Elements Measured:

Al, Mg

number of measurements made:

200

number of measurements made:

400

number of measurements made:

441

data start row:

801

data start row:

1242

data start row:

793

data start row:

1601

data end row:

992

data end row:

1241

data end row:

2000

data end row:

1641

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

Files

EPMA WIRS Analysis (3)

Settings

Region of Interest:

Center

Region of Interest:

Edge

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

Files

Forward Model Simulation (13)

Settings

Region of Interest:

center

Region of Interest:

edge

Region of Interest:

near edge

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.25 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.35 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.4 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.3 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.45 k_v

Simulated partition coefficient:

0.5 k_v

Mean simulated Al contentl:

7.38 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

7.43 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

6.32 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

8.13 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

3.65 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

8.62 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

4.6 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

4.19 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

3.22 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

7.76 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

8.86 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

6.01 wt%

Mean simulated Al contentl:

6.76 wt%

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

2.66

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

2.58

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.54

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.76

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

2.67

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.6

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

4

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

1.72

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.58

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.14

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

0.07

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

1.33

Least Squares difference simulation versus experiment:

5

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

Files

Phase Fraction Analysis (3)

Settings

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

Region of Interest:

Edge

Region of Interest:

Center

Number of images analyzed:

10

Number of images analyzed:

12

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

Files

PhaseSeparationAlgorithm_Final.m

Received As-Cast Plates (1)

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

SEM Imaging (3)

Settings

Date:

1/25/2016

Region of Interest:

Center

Region of Interest:

Edge

Region of Interest:

Near Edge

View Field Width:

50 µm

View Field Width:

200 µm

Imaging Mode:

SE

Voltage:

10 keV

Beam Intensity:

10

Measurements

Alloy Name:

Mg-9Al

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

8.319 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.979 %

beta + Al-Mn phase fraction:

6.7 %

Mean experimental Al content:

4.33 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

8.43 wt%

Mean experimental Al content:

7.34 wt%

Plate Thickness:

5 mm

Standard deviation:

0.622 %

Standard deviation:

1.107 %

Standard deviation:

0.362 %

Composition Al Content:

8.99 wt %

Composition Mn Content:

0.11 wt %

Composition Mg Content:

90.9 wt %

Files

See 53 more files......